At what point do luxuries become
necessities? Do we just have to have the latest iPad release?
Corporations feed off of our consumerist society by creating endless supplies
for endless demands of new and trivial gadgets. Predictably, this leads to
enormous amounts of waste along every step of a product’s life cycle, from
manufacturing and production to throwing it away when it breaks or becomes
obsolete. It has been estimated that for every 100 pounds manufactured, 3200
pounds of waste are created in the production process alone (Woodhouse, p.132).
So what is the solution to this dilemma? Does the responsibility fall to the
engineers who design these products to create a more green production cycle
that creates less waste, or is the onus on the consumers to finally decide that
no, they don’t actually need the latest iPad Air, the old one works just fine.
The obvious answer is obviously more complex than picking one group or the
other, but while the engineering world is starting to make progress in both the
corporate and academic world regarding a less wasteful (and more profitable)
production cycle, human greed and need for consumption seem to be more
difficult problems for us to master.
There are a lot of factors that
go into our culture of waste, but I think it all stems back to one
philosophical belief of modern consumerism: The more money we have, the more
willing we become to spend it. Based on this philosophy, it’s easy to see how
life can quickly become filled with unnecessary luxuries, just for the sake of
having them. Another problem, one article argues, is that the 9-5 work week
creates tired workers who want nothing more than instant gratification in what
little free time is available (Raptitude, 2014). What do tired people with
extra money do to relieve stress and reward themselves? For most people, the
answer is spending money, making them consumer, which brings us back to the
root of the original waste problem.
Changing the consumerist mindset
of an entire society is no small task, particularly now that most things in
society have become connected on a global scale. Consumerism also has tangible
benefits, because spending money creates more demand, which in turn creates
more jobs, which helps the economy as a whole. It’s easy to see how cutting
back on spending on a large scale could be potentially disastrous for the
economy, however at the rate we as a society buy things up, waste is only going
to continue to pile up, faster than engineering can counter it with new
innovations and procedures, and an impotent world of waste has a much bleaker
outlook than a down economy in the long run.
References
Woodhouse, Edward. The Future
of Technological Civilization. University Readers, 2013. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment